Agents and LLM features that hold up in production.
Assistants grounded in your data, kept inside their scope, evaluated before release, and observable after. Built so the first answer is useful and the thousandth is still safe.
JagsSoft provides senior software consulting. I step in as your staff engineer, engineering manager, or interim CTO, and help your team build with AI now and stay ready for what comes next.
Software is being rewritten, again. The teams that win won’t be the ones with the most AI tools. They’ll be the ones with clear architecture, honest measurement, and leaders who know where AI helps and where it hurts.
Three types of engagement, widening in scope from the system, to the team, to the whole technology function. Choose the one that matches where your company is today.
Hands-on technical leadership. I take the architecture decisions, the hard problems, and the features that are too risky to hand off, and I raise the bar of the code around me.
Design and build LLM features and agents properly: grounded in your data, scoped, evaluated, and observable. Set up coding-agent workflows so your engineers ship faster without lowering quality.
I run the team day to day: planning, delivery rhythm, hiring, mentoring, and the connection between engineering and the rest of the business.
Update how the team works for AI-assisted development: review practices, security and IP rules, new expectations for junior and senior engineers, and honest measurement of what actually speeds delivery.
I cover the seat during a transition or a search: technology strategy, vendor and budget decisions, org structure, and a clean handoff to your permanent hire.
Set the AI strategy: where to build, buy, or wait; data and vendor risk; and a roadmap tied to the business instead of the hype cycle.
AI changes what a small team can ship. It also changes what can go wrong. I help you capture the first and manage the second.
Assistants grounded in your data, kept inside their scope, evaluated before release, and observable after. Built so the first answer is useful and the thousandth is still safe.
Coding agents, review practices, and test coverage that let your team move faster without quietly lowering the bar.
Build, buy, or wait. Data, vendor, and security risk. A roadmap tied to the business instead of the news cycle.
Roles, hiring, skills, and ways of working that fit a world where every engineer has an agent beside them, and where judgment matters more than typing speed.
A few convictions that shape every engagement.
It’s fast, tireless, and sometimes confidently wrong. Give it context, boundaries, and review, the same as anyone you onboard.
When code is cheap to generate, clear boundaries and good data models decide whether a system stays understandable.
Lines produced and prompts sent are vanity metrics. Cycle time, defects, and customer outcomes are the scoreboard.
Tools change every quarter. Accountability, judgment, and taste stay with the humans on the team.
I read every message myself and reply by email, usually within two business days.
I’ll reply by email, usually within two business days.